Almost out of nowhere the sheep are sharing links to the Joseph Kony 2012 campaign without really investigating what they are doing. Millions of people across the world are poking their noses out of their slacktivist duvets and pushing a button to LIKE or TWEET just because it has become the thing to do.
Slacktivism is defined thus: The idea that sharing, liking or retweeting will solve a problem.
Someone has to actually do the work and make the problem go away people – just passing the problem on and going ‘WTF’, ‘OMG’ or ‘WWJD’ helps fokol mense.
Some background to this latest wave of Slacktivism:
According to non-profit, Invisible Children, “Joseph Kony is the world’s worst war criminal. In 1987 he took over leadership of an existing rebel group and renamed it the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA).
“The LRA has earned a reputation for its cruel and brutal tactics. When Joseph Kony found himself running out of fighters, he started abducting children to be soldiers in his army or ‘wives’ for his officers. The LRA is encouraged to rape, mutilate, and kill civilians–often with blunt weapons.
“The LRA is no longer active in northern Uganda (where it originated) but it continues its campaign of violence in Democratic Republic of Congo, Central African Republic, and South Sudan. In its 26-year history, the LRA has abducted more than 30,000 children and displaced at least 2.1 million people.
“Invisible Children has been working for 9 years to end Africa’s longest-running armed conflict. U.S. military advisers are currently deployed in Central Africa on a ‘time-limited’ mission to stop Kony and disarm the LRA. If Kony isn’t captured this year, the window will be gone.”
The cynic in me always says; “No-one actually does something good for no reward – not even the Pope!”. Allied to that I am a firm believer in; “Follow the Money”. Especially after the rumblings that have come my way with regard to Public Benefit Organisations in our neck of the woods – see: Guidelines for PBO’s.
So whilst the sheep were wagging their stumpy tails and passing these links on others such as Mashable and Visible Children have been raising questions about the legitimacy of Invisible Children’s claims to be ALL ABOUT stopping Kony.
Visible Children said; “Invisible Children has been condemned time and time again. As a registered not-for-profit, its finances are public. Last year, the organization spent $8,676,614. Only 32% went to direct services (page 6), with much of the rest going to staff salaries, travel and transport, and film production. This is far from ideal, and Charity Navigator rates their accountability 2/4 stars because they haven’t had their finances externally audited. But it goes way deeper than that.”
Download the Invisible Children financials here.
In South Africa the accepted legislated norm is that at least 75% of a non-profits turnover is used for what is termed direct services as above. So, here Invisible Children get a big fat FAIL in my book as they collected over $13 million in donations and, in the SA context that amounts to a distribution of only 20.41% of the funds.
We have to be cognisant of different country tax laws governing non-profits though.
Invisible Children say this about their financials; “Invisible Children’s financial statements are online for everyone to see. Financial statements from the last 5 years, including our 990, are available at www.invisiblechildren.com/financials. The organization spent 80.46% on our programs that further our three fold mission, 16.24% on administration and management costs and 3.22% on direct fundraising in FY2011. Invisible Children is independently audited every year and in full compliance with our 501 c 3 status.
“See a screen-shot (click here) from pages 35 and 36 of the 2011 Invisible Children annual report that detail our total expenses for Fiscal Year 2011. An expense statement by class is the way nonprofits present their expenses to the public because it’s the clearest way to show the purpose of different organizational expenses vs. a line item expense statement such as the one on Page 6 of our Audited Financial Report.”
So, once again the accountants have seen a gap, the creatives have seen a way to charge ever higher development fees and the sheep have shuffled along clicking and baa’ing even greater amounts of money out of their slacktivist pockets.
The Invisible Children have climbed into your pocket – come back this time next year to see if Joseph Kony is sitting behind bars or still flipping the bird to so-called intelligent and civilized people such as you and I.
Although – maybe you should be giving your money to this wild Hillbilly who is actively hunting Kony down and has started an orphanage in Uganda – Meet Sam Childers, the Machine Gun Preacher, at least he put his life on the line and didn’t just click a link!
Alan Straton
Latest posts by Alan Straton (see all)
- Balwin Properties Sets Out What Comes Standard in Its New Apartments - 13 November 2026
- Dr. T Fletcher Calls for Glaucoma Checks Before the Year Closes - 13 November 2026
- PaperTrail Adds Scout AI Search to Its Document Management Software - 12 November 2026
- Wavepool Surf Tour Launches Ride the Future 2026. Let’s Go! - 12 November 2026
- Online Catalogue With Shelly Smart Automation Range and Bespoke 3D-Printed Installer Accessories - 12 November 2026
People will continue to hand over the bucks to ease their conscience in the belief that they are supporting a worthy cause without doing due diligence to ensure that the funds are in fact reaching the people or cause that they are supposedly contributing to. As it is here someone is benefitting hugely from the suffering of others.
It is time that people stop trying to ease their tiny human conscience by believing that they have paid their dues to humanity by giving to some unscrupulous human being to line their pockets.
In time the lined pockets will come up with some other get rich scheme at the expense of the idiots who hand over without questioning or determining whether the true needy listed NPO is receiving what is rightfully due to them.
Stop being a sheep, stand up and be counted. Imagine having a single brain cell that can actually question the motive and do some math.
How blinker visioned this report is. But the writer, Alan
Straton, admitted that he believes that “No-one actually does something
good for no reward – not even the Pope!”. Therefore, it would follow
that must be a trait of his own. The currupt are often cynical, not
being able to imagine anyone being different from their own standards.
He appears to have judged the %ages spent purely at face value, not
taking into account the knock-on or indirect affect of the spending
choices made.
Mr Alan Straton, it appears that you have missed the point, and maybe
people should consider the possibility that THIS report is leading the
“sheep” in the wrong direction.
Kathryn, your contribution to this ‘debate’ is highly appreciated.
The ‘rewards’ that this cynic revels in are those intangible ones that manifest themselves when people do good or the ‘right thing’ and, yes, I am human, when someone such as yourself takes the time to test and challenge my thoughts.
For this I thank you.
I assume that you are referring to ‘corrupt’ as an individual who is debased in character, depraved, perverted, wicked and evil.
On some level we are all debased in character, depraved, perverted, wicked and evil, so yes I do share that trait with all in the world then. Recognising that flaw and being able to control it are what sets many apart though.
As an observer of human nature I err on the side of caution when seeing how caught up people become in any sort of movement. When emotion is used to elicit a response without providing some form of balance then normally some form of disaster or sadness follows.
I am a firm believer in trying to present some form of balance – which I honestly believe I have done here.
Obviously, one does find some people who are too clouded with emotion to see the merit of balance and need to be educated to dialogue in a manner that will benefit them and their cause.
I DO make the point that the legislative environment in the USA is different to the South African one which is far more prescriptive in demanding that 75% of money collected on behalf of a charity is then distributed to that charity.
SA law does NOT take into account such subjective concepts as ‘the knock-on or indirect affect of the spending choices made’. I am unaware of what the USA law states.
The REAL point of my article was that just saying something is bad without actually doing something tangible about it is what the ‘sheep’ are doing, hence the reference to Sam Childers.