MyPE

Community Business Directory, Event Listings, News and Views from Gqeberha, Nelson Mandela Bay

Thousands of jobs may be at stake

By

The Eastern Cape Automotive cluster says that SA’s catalytic converter industry, once responsible for 16% of global production, will hit a wall over the next two or three years when a new EU regulation kicks in and that thousands of jobs may be at stake.

Euro 6 is the common name for European emissions standards coming into effect for passenger cars in the bloc on September 1 2015. But, according to one insider, the local industry has seen “no upgrades or investments of consequence” to meet this specification.

This is an extraordinary fact but few people will speak on the record. The reason, rumour has it, is that the industry is reaching for one last lifeline that might save it, and doesn’t want government upset by reports in the media. SA has by far the largest reserves of platinum and palladium, metals crucial to the catalytic converter industry. It is also hard to imagine a better example of beneficiation, which trade & industry minister Rob Davies has repeatedly said is central to industrialisation. And, at a time when the motor industry is enjoying huge government support , one would expect the catalytic converter industry to be propped up too.

This hasn’t happened, for two reasons. The first is that the details of the motor industry’s new automotive production & development programme (APDP) weren’t nailed down for years. “We’ve had seven years of policy uncertainty,” says a component industry insider. Discussions on the content of the programme began in 2006 and were still continuing late into 2012. As far back as 2011, BMW’s board member for production, later its chairman, Frank-Peter Arndt, expressed his displeasure with policy uncertainty in SA to Business Day. “We need clear commitments,” he said in March that year.

The second reason is more complex. Under the motor industry development programme (MIDP), the APDP’s predecessor, the industry was heavily subsidised. Roger Pitot, director of the National Association of Automotive Component & Allied Manufacturers, says some of the major car makers were importing 20000 vehicles a year duty- free as a result of credits earned on their exports of autocatalysts.

It seems likely that the department of trade & industry and treasury did a cost/benefit analysis of the autocat industry under the MIDP and found very little value there. Evidence of this is in the detail of the APDP, a programme with which component manufacturers have long expressed dissatisfaction. Originally the autocat industry was offered a rebate of only 5%, which was upped to 8% for “vulnerable industries”. Despite receiving complaints, the department has since indicated that its generosity has reached an end.

“For [international component manufacturers], the APDP isn’t as good as the MIDP,” Pitot said last year. “The benefits are low. They’re looking at the APDP and are saying that SA isn’t that attractive. It’s more expensive. So they’re looking at other countries to do the business.” The same problem is experienced by other export-heavy local component manufacturers, such as leather suppliers, which also battle to compete without state assistance. It means that while catalytic converters and other components might be competitive at the factory gate, they struggle in their end markets.

The industry is believed to have approached the department of mineral resources for some kind of relief on the price of platinum. Derek Engelbrecht, group executive for marketing at Impala Platinum, said last month the company had “heard rumblings that the autocat industry is seeking relief from us [to adjust prices]”. He said: “[The initiative] could be coming from the Catalytic Converter Interest Group (CCIG), which includes big groups like Johnson Matthey, the canning companies and the original equipment manufacturers, but the platinum industry is not a part of it. “We have not been consulted. I believe that to benefit one industry, you do not need to harm another,” Engelbrecht said.

Asked whether proposals had been put to government to impose price cuts for local beneficiation, Ken Dewar, executive director of the CCIG, confirmed: “We are talking to the departments of mineral resources and trade & industry to see how we can regain the confidence of the international motor industry.” He wouldn’t go into detail, saying it was “difficult to dictate to government”.

When asked how catalytic converter manufacturers could be seeking relief when platinum prices are so low and the industry is under such enormous pressure, Engelbrecht pointed out: “It is not metal prices that are making the autocat industry uncompetitive, it is inefficiency in logistics and the supply chain.” He said: “We sell on contract to the big car companies and they allocate deliveries to their manufacturing sites, whether in Detroit or SA. There is no difference in the cost of the metal to manufacturers in SA and anywhere else.”

An additional difficulty faced by the SA autocat industry is its vulnerability to the regulatory regime for motor vehicles in Europe, which changes extremely fast, as does the technology that underpins it. Manufacturers are not only looking at alternatives to platinum, such as palladium, they are starting to look at entirely new drivetrain technologies. SA’s double whammy of uncompetitive component manufacturers and the dilly-dallying over the APDP has meant that Euro 6 is, in development and investment terms, a boat this country has missed.

SA’s catalytic converter industry employs about 5000 people, with, it is claimed, a further 25000 downstream jobs in mines and logistics. This, for many, will be reason enough to look at the regulatory regime around the catalytic converter industry in SA. Unlike a fully built-up motor vehicle, an exported catalytic converter, at 85% local content according to the CCIG, is a true net export.

And the DTI is adamant the industry has not been abandoned. Indeed, under the APDP, catalytic converter manufacturers can claim a rebate of up to 30% of any new investment in SA. Thereafter, “the onus is on them to identify and put in place very clear and serious competitiveness-raising programmes instead of waiting for benefits which will undermine the coherence of the APDP,” said Nimrod Zalk, then deputy director-general at the DTI, in 2010.

In September last year Port Elizabeth-based autocat manufacturer BASF announced retrenchments of 53 staff in an SA-only restructuring. It seems likely they will not be the last because it is apparent, from the dearth of investment for future technologies, that the catalytic converter industry has failed to find efficiencies. As a result, even if the state changed its mind about supporting the industry, it might already be too late.

The following two tabs change content below.

Port Elizabethan

This author is a 'catch-all' for occasional articles and letters written to MyPE. The Author of each article can be found in the signature at the bottom of each individual article.