As South Africa grapples with growing the economy and sustainable socio-economic development, it is often said that innovation is the silver bullet to help the country achieve its developmental goals.
In this regard, the World Bank’s September 2017, 10th South Africa Economic Update observes that innovation can raise South Africa’s competitiveness and allow breaking into new markets and creating jobs. “It can also significantly improve the life of millions of poor South Africans and their chance for economic participation, through the provision of better and cheaper goods and services, in health, transports, and e-government notably. Fundamentally, innovation can help South Africa diversify from its traditional commodity based economic model which did not lead to the reduction of inequalities in last decades.”
The OECD in a 2002 study entitled, “Foreign Direct Investment for Development: Maximising Benefits, Minimising Costs” observes that “a preponderance of studies shows that FDI triggers technology spillovers [which] helps create a more competitive business environment and enhances enterprise development. All of these contribute to higher economic growth, which is the most potent tool for alleviating poverty in developing countries.”
In looking at the question of how corruption impacts on these technology transfers, R&D and innovation, a unique paper entitled “How do foreign firms’ corruption practices affect innovation performance in host countries? Industry-level evidence from transition economies,” by HSRC researcher Dr Alexis Habiyaremye and Wladimir Raymond from Statec Luxemburg find that trans- and multinationals do not necessarily support local R&D and innovation.
Using data from the fourth wave of the EBRD – World Bank Business Environment and Enterprise Performance Survey (BEEPS) which was launched in 2008-2009 to collect data for the 2005-2007 period using approximately 12 000 enterprises in 30 countries from Eastern Europe and Central and Western Asia, the researchers have found:
- There is no significant negative direct effect of corruption on the introduction of new products onto the market.
- An increase in foreign firms engaging in grand corruption in an industry discourages investment in R&D, reduces the likelihood of upgrading existing lines of products and/or services and stifles the development of new products or services for all firms in the same industry.
- An increase in the proportion of domestic firms with petty corruption activities decreases the likelihood of R&D and incremental innovation.
- Speed money (bribery) paid by foreign firms supports better innovation output which is imported from the home country. The innovation outputs and R&D in the host country is therefore unaffected while there is an absence of the transfer of skills and knowledge.
Speaking about the significance of this study, Dr Habiyaremye said, “This is the first time that corruption has been categorised in this way to assess the impact on local innovation and R&D. We have made use of two forms of distinctions to help get a closer look at this phenomenon at industry level: grand corruption (involving important government officials) versus petty corruption (involving bureaucratic processes) and domestic firms versus foreign firms in the host economy.”
“Our study finds that transnational corruption is detrimental to innovation in host countries, but benefits foreign firms involved in it. Since their corruption behaviour in host countries affects primarily innovation efforts and incremental innovation, this puts non-corrupt domestic firms in host countries at a disadvantage as R&D is the most important input to new and improved products. Subsidiaries of multi-national enterprises can rely on their access to foreign technologies for the innovative outcomes in their host countries and reap the benefits of corruption without bearing its full costs.”
With these insights in mind, it will be important for countries to be more vigilant about the impact of corruption on actual investments in domestic R&D, innovation and technology transfers. This will be crucial as South Africa prioritises building the requisite capacity to move into the digital economy to access the opportunities presented by the 4th Industrial Revolution.
Latest posts by Alan Straton (see all)
- Kani Celebration: The Revolution Will not be Televised, The Revolution Will be Live - 24 February 2018
- Huncle and the Way to Eat an Ice cream - 23 February 2018
- Engcobo attack shows that crime is out of control - 22 February 2018
- Leinster vs Southern Kings - 22 February 2018
- ABYC Eviction Attempt – a personal view - 22 February 2018